Big Pharma is Not Suppressing the Cure for Cancer

June 26, 2017

Courtesy of Doug Wheller via Flickr Commons

Lately my Facebook feed has filled up with memes and videos about miracle cures for cancer that THEY don’t want you to know about. I’ve avoided commenting on them, because I don’t want to offend my friends, but every time I see one of these things, I spontaneously combust.

Look, I get it. I lost my mother to cancer in 2009, two days before her 56th birthday. I have lived the rollercoaster of pain and grief and desperation that cancer causes, and I would have given anything for a miraculous Australian plant to implode her tumours in one tasty and side-effect free treatment. So would she, believe me.

I’m not an oncologist or a cancer researcher, but I am a geneticist. And since cancer is a genetic disease, it got covered at length during my schooling. Which means you can trust me when I say that Big Pharma is not suppressing the cure for cancer. Even leaving aside the logistics of maintaining a conspiracy on that scale, it’s just not possible, because there is no single cure for cancer, and there never will be.

Because cancer is complicated.

We call it cancer as though it’s a single condition, like Type I diabetes or ALS, but “cancer” is actually an umbrella term for dozens of further categories of disease. They all have one thing in common – the mechanisms that control normal cell division in our bodies (the kind that seals that nasty paper cut) break down. Without those controls in place, the cells just keep on dividing, forming tumours and rampaging through the body. But here’s the thing. Although the end result – out of control cell division – is the hallmark of cancer, the pathway by which cells lose control is always different. Always.

That’s because the systems that control cell division are encoded in our genes. And the mutations that destroy those systems are accidents. They are random. Mutations can happen in any gene at any time. Acquisition of a collection of mutations that cause the failsafes to break down is completely coincidental.

Which means that every single cancer patient’s cancer is unique. And that’s why it’s so difficult to treat. Cancer doctors and researchers have no choice but to play the odds – to attack the things that different cancers often have in common. But they can’t account for the endless variation, no matter how hard they try. And they can’t prevent cancer cells from continuing to mutate, becoming resistant to treatment – just like bacteria become resistant to antibiotics.

And that’s why there will never be a magic bullet cure for cancer. It’s not because cancer researchers aren’t motivated – many of them choose to study cancer because they’ve lost loved ones of their own. And it’s certainly not because there’s too much money is keeping people sick (which is patently ridiculous – every economist will tell you that sick people cost money). “THE CURE” will never be found because cancer is a moving target, and worse, it’s a target that’s embedded so deeply within us, it can never be fully eradicated.

So stop with the memes, please. Just stop. And if you want to know more about what cancer medicine is really up against, do yourself a favour – read Siddhartha Mukherjee’s The Emperor of All Maladies. It will make you grateful that cancer medicine has come as far as it has.




7 Comments on ‘Big Pharma is Not Suppressing the Cure for Cancer’

  1. Clear as a bell….every patient’s cancer is different….thank you.

    Reply | 
    1. Thanks, Kate.

      Reply | 
  2. Thank you so much for sharing this. I knew the memes were wrong but did not know why. I very much appreciate the great strides that have been made in cancer research. They saved my son’s life.

    Reply | 
    1. Oh, that’s wonderful, Pauline. I’m so glad your son beat the odds. Hugs.

      Reply | 
  3. I’m still so sorry for you and your family about what you’ve been through losing your mom, Lindsey. You are absolutely right, cancer research has come a long way and you are also right that every patient’s cancer is different. I too have lost very close people to cancer, five to be precise and I also have helped another five people overcome cancer, me included. Two of them chose alternative cures entirely, two did everything the oncologist said, and I agreed eventually to at least to surgery. There are alternative ways to cure any disease, no matter how complex, Lindsey, I can testify to that. But no matter what treatment method the patient chooses, we are to support their decision whatever it is and not question it, because our support is the straw they cling to. So while an Australian super plant might not be the solution to a complex disease as cancer, we don’t need to believe that chemo is the only solution either.

    Reply | 
    1. Thanks, Antje – hugs. I am so glad the choices you made worked for you. I agree with you that the patient should be allowed to make the final decision about their care, because the patient is the only one who really knows how he or she is feeling and what is right for them. As their loved ones, we should absolutely respect those decisions, even when it comes to stopping treatment entirely, no matter how painful that may be for the bystanders.

      What worries me is that it’s so easy for misinformation to spread, and that the deliberate spreading of misinformation is both dangerous and irresponsible. Yes, patients should make their own choices, but only when they have access to reliable information, and the tools to tell the difference between science and wishful thinking, no matter how seductive wishful thinking might be.

      Reply | 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *